Pharma · Medical Writing · Biostatistics
CSRs under ICH E3, protocols, SAPs, TLFs and CTD Module 2 summaries — built on sponsor-confidential, often unblinded trial data that can't be handed to a public model. Untraceable cloaks product names, patient data and endpoints before the AI sees them, so medical writing and biostatistics teams get frontier AI without touching submission integrity.
The suite, in your workflow
The same eight-tool suite that runs on patent-pending cloaking — pointed at clinical and regulatory writing and the analyses behind it.
Cloak product names, trial identifiers, patient-level data and endpoints before any AI sees them.
Draft and rewrite CSR sections (ICH E3), protocol synopses, CTD Module 2 summaries and safety narratives on cloaked data.
Generate pseudo-IPD and auto-produce statistical code on cloaked data behind your TLFs — survival, descriptive statistics, epidemiology analyses and more.
Converge multiple models on high-stakes wording — safety-signal interpretation, benefit-risk language.
Start CSRs, protocols, SAPs and CTD modules from compliance-aware structure instead of a blank page.
Automate TLF-adjacent and summary reporting from a single Excel source of truth.
Ask quick questions across a cloaked SAP, protocol or CSR shell.
Certify cloaked AI use for regulatory integrity; keep an audit trail of every value, cloak and submission.
The Grounding Codex
VaultScribe writes on Hybrid RAG plus a Grounding Codex — a human-curated source corpus where critical guideline information is organized to augment AI intelligence while remaining human-anchored: AI-drafted, then reviewed and iterated against direct expert judgment until every entry holds up, not machine-scraped and not left unchecked. Our published multi-model work shows this grounding measurably lifts writing quality and reduces hallucination; that study was run on an HEOR health-technology-assessment knowledge layer, and the same human-anchored approach extends the Codex to regulatory and biostatistics conventions.
Available in Canada · in development for the US & Europe
Tracing every sentence back to the SDTM/ADaM datasets and source documents behind it — so a reviewer can follow any statement in a CSR or summary to its underlying data for submission-grade traceability. Available today for Canada; in active development for the US and Europe.
The evidence
In a controlled comparison of de-identification methods, Semantic Cloaking retained 91–94/100 writing quality against a 96/100 baseline — while censorship fell to 42 and substitution to 18. The method that protects the data keeps the prose usable.
Read the preprint — Tremblay & Harricharan (2026) →Across four models, grounding in a curated field knowledge layer improved mean writing quality +2.4/100 (up to +10.0 on writing), judged by a blinded AI Delphi panel — demonstrated on an HEOR/HTA layer, the same method the Codex applies to regulatory writing.
Read the RAG / knowledge-layer preprint →See it on your own CSR, protocol or SAP workflow — the AI never sees a confidential value.